Skip to main content

About your Search

20120926
20121004
STATION
CNBC 5
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5
CNBC
Sep 26, 2012 4:00pm EDT
points. first of all, defense will and can make a contribution to deficit reduction. secondly, this is not the way. the sequester is the worst way to go about reducing defense spending. thirdly, the right way to do it is to go after taxes, raise tax revenue and cut the entitlement programs, which are driving long-term spending growth and debt creation in this country. it's not defense, which is on a relatively stable downward path. so, you know, i would agree that we need to cut our deficits. it's just the wrong way to do it. >> so what is the better way to do it? here we have, you know, automatic cuts coming, automatic tax increases coming. a lot of people predicting that 2013 will be a recession as a result of this. we haven't even heard from the defense companies in terms of how many jobs they're about to cut because of it. so what's the best way to do it? >> keep in mind nobody wants the sequester to happen. maybe chris and his colleagues at catos are an exception. the idea of a sequester is so awf awful, it would cut so deeply into spending, it should never happen. it's a
CNBC
Oct 3, 2012 4:00pm EDT
$86 million a day to the federal government. that's a lot of revenue that could help with deficit, deficit reduction and our debt structure. the third piece of that is we could become more energy secure as a nation. today we're less reliant on outside sources. new technologies have allowed us to produce all the energy we'll need right here at home. if we create policies to allow us to use americans to create american energy, it'll benefit us all. those are the things that could be done immediately. >> so how come the administration isn't doing it, if it's that obvious these jobs can be created soon? >> well, it's unfortunate because i think their limitations on the industry is driven by, in my view, extreme ideology. it's driven by an irresponsible view that we can switch from one energy form to the other overnight. somehow, we can take the 62% of our energy in the u.s., which happens to be oil and natural gas, and just flip a switch and turn that to wind mills or solar panels. all energy forms are important to us, but the reality is it took us 100 years in the united states to ge
CNBC
Sep 27, 2012 4:00pm EDT
market companies? and what do we do about the deficit? >> john, it's great to have you on the program. thank you so much. >> thanks, maria. >> john thain joining us as chairman and ceo at cit. let's get to brian shackman. >> fascinating to look at this. they beat on eps and revenue. the the revenue was 6.67. take a look at the stock. it is dropping and continues to drop. now down 4%. it's been a percent every two minutes during that thain interview. we were looking at margins, looking at china, and the u.s. margins were compressed. that's a negative. china was better than expected. that's not offsetting things. u.s. was better than expected. that's not offsetting things. europe was supposed to be up 3.4%. it was down 5%. they paid more in taxes. their sg&a means they're spending more than they're taking in. it's a mixed bag. >> all right, brian. thank you so much. meanwhile, we told you research in motion out with earnings. the stock is soaring in the extended hours trading session. what does that mean to investors in we have the analysis on r.i.m. next. >>> and would you spend twice
CNBC
Sep 28, 2012 4:00pm EDT
, then there's no way we're going to deal with a $16 trillion debt and $1 trillion a year deficit. >> medicare, medicaid, social security. fe forget about that. >> this is a no-brainer. first of all, look on your cell phone bill with the tliline tha says universal service fund or fee. you're paying for this. you need to call your member of congress, your senators, call anybody you can and tell them to get on board with killing this program. i have been shocked at how hard it's been to convince people. a lot of that's because people don't know. but you're helping educate them. >> on the cell phone, it says universal fee, universal services fee. that's the cost that taxpayers are paying so that low-income folks can get these phones. that's what we should be looking for. just to be clear, they're not just getting a free phone, but free service. >> it's the service. what happens is the government pays the service and the phones are often given by the provider. that's right. >> all right, congressman. great to have you on the program. we'll be watching this developing story. really an extraordinary
CNBC
Oct 1, 2012 4:00pm EDT
. we wanted a menu of thoughtful choices to reduce our deficit and avoid sequestration. >> go through it for us. because, you know, i guess if it were that easy, it would have been a lot simpler getting to the point where we're at. can you talk to us specifics about what you think should be cut? >> sure. that's what we wanted to do in this report. it's more than $100 billion in agriculture, more than $100 billion in energy, and as i said, in agriculture, commodity crop payments, reforming crop insurance. in energy, we'd like to eliminate the entire tight. 17 loan guarantee program which includes the loan guarantee, you know, the program that brought you solyndra. we'd like to eliminate subsidies that have gone to the oldest and most profitable energy sectors, from the intangible drilling costs to the allowance for last in, first out accounting which actually affects more than the energy sector, but it's just a boondoggle for taxpayers in the u.s. it's not something that's allowed by international accounting stanstandards. in the defense sector, there's a real opportunity for savings b
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5